In my experience with art, when one is beginning to look at art, going alone gives more freedom. Now if one is well versed on art and has studied it, that maybe a different matter.
I find that people will not be as honest with what they like if others are with them. I have a lot of friends who like abstract art which leaves me cold. I go with them and appreciate their love of these artists, but the art does nothing for me. It puts a damper on them sometimes, because they get excited about something that I cannot feign excitement for.
The same can be said of my love of classical art. I love Gainsborough who does beautiful portraits, but I have a good friend who thinks Gainsborough is limited. Since I am versed in art, this opinion does not affect me, but if I was new to art, that opinion might limit me or make me question what I like.
It's great to talk to assistants and learn art history, but just seeing art is what the experience is about. When I take children on art exhibitions, I let them explore what moves them and what they see. I give the information as needed, but the experience is really about what they see and feel.
I just went on an exhibit for Matisse and Picasso recently and found a new respect for them. I saw a Picasso in a gallery and thought it would be lovely on my wall. I may not have thought of that ten years ago. For the longest time I felt Picasso was overrated, but now I see why he is such a great influence. I know a lot of Picasso fans. If they had been with me, they would have pushed Picasso's "genius" down my throat, which would have made me less open to him.
So my advice, as I was asked, is to venture into art alone at first. When you become comfortable with what you like, share your views with others. If you have questions, ask gallery assistants and museum curriators. Most museums have audio tours to take and that can be great. The most important thing about art is to see it and feel it for yourself.
comments